Treatment with Results
-
Why does solid evidence matter?
-
"Empirically-based" treatment is based on multiple Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT). This is important and this term, and the term "evidence-based" are often misused. When considering treatment, it is important to look at the quality of the evidence and ask some critical questions.
-
-
How do we know the evidence is solid?
-
(There are multiple randomized controlled trials. The research has been scrutinized by other researchers and the results have been replicated.)
-
-
How do we know whether the treatment works
-
(There are multiple randomized controlled trials comparing those who receive the treatment vs those who receive no treatment.)
-
-
How do we know a treatment works better than something else?
-
(There are randomized controlled trials comparing one treatment with another treatment.)
-
-
How do we know why a treatment works?
-
(There are dismantling studies that separate components of a treatment and evaluate efficacy.)
-
-
Why does this matter?
-
Treatments that, despite intense marketing, do not have solid evidence can make the patient worse. Treatments that are "pseudoscientific" can confuse a patient and use up a patient's time and financial resources by providing a component of treatment that works with components that are not evidence-based.
-
When you invest time, hard work, and finances in a treatment, you want the highest chance of success. Treatments that are based on solid and repeated research have lasting positive effects.
-
-
What are the results of our DBT programs?
-
Since beginning our DBT programs in February of 2006, we have been measuring treatment outcomes with scientifically reliable measures.
-
We use these results to make adjustments to individual treatment plans and for ongoing evaluation of program effectiveness.
-
We are dedicated to making sure we provide treatment that works.
-
Results from our treatment show that people have improved relationships, greater ability to manage moods effectively, much less use of harmful behaviors, and an average 40% improvement in the quality of their life.
Follow the links below for data analysis of our treatment results.
On the IASC graphs, the "control" group is a random sample of 620 adults in the USA in 1990 who had a telephone number listed, along with 70 university students. Their results were used to test reliability and validity and provide a non-clinical standard.
emotional dysregulation and gaining control of emotional expression
self harm, substance use and unhealthy ways of reducing internal distress

